Panel conveys dire warning, LAUSD board seems to get message
Mike Szymanski | November 11, 2015
Support LA School Report's year-end campaign. All donations will be matched dollar for dollar.
An independent Financial Review Panel yesterday detailed drastic measures that LA Unified must take to remain afloat in what school board President Steve Zimmer calls a “perfect storm” of financial trouble for the district.
“There’s a fiscal cliff that is immediate if different decisions are not made,” warned Bill Lockyer, the former California attorney general and state treasurer and one of the all-volunteer panel that made the group’s presentation to a full house in the school board meeting on Tuesday.
“You will be out of $600 million by 2019,” said another member of the panel, Darline Robles, the former superintendent of the Los Angeles County Office of Education. “You will have to rein in certain expenditures.”
And Maria Anguiano, the vice chancellor for Business & Finance at University of California, Riverside, said the loss of 100,000 students over the past two years in the district means that the LAUSD staff should not be growing like it has, and that “10,000 lay-offs would be about level for the 100,000 loss of students.”
But the drama of the exchange was not so much the bad news the panel members were delivering, including strong recommendations to make across-the-board spending cuts — the board members were well aware it was coming. Rather, it was the board’s apparent sense of urgency to deal with it and the district’s labor partners utter silence when offered the opportunity to comment.
“Sacrifice will be much more important here than strategy,” said board vice president George McKenna. “What are we going to give up for the children?”
Mónica Ratliff, perhaps the board’s most strident budget hawk, said, “This is something that clearly needs to be done and it involves all our labor partners. This is very serious.”
Ref Rodriguez reiterated the point, saying some “hard conversations” await. “We’ve been putting this off too long,” he said.
Zimmer identified three factors pushing the district toward the financial abyss: the federal government’s reneging on promises of more money for special education students, creating a $200 million shortfall for the district; the state’s “extremely low” per-pupil funding level and the district’s steady decline in enrollment.
After Zimmer invited the district’s labor leaders to address the board with any comment, only Alex Caputo-Pearl, president of the teachers union, UTLA, stepped forward. But instead of acknowledging anything the financial panel members discussed, he invited forward a group of parents to bemoan the Broad Foundation‘s proposed charter school expansion plan. His rationale was charter schools draw students away from traditional schools, costing programs, money and jobs.
Later, outside the meeting room, Caputo-Pearl said any changes in staffing would have to be negotiated with his union and the others that serve LA Unified.
“This brings even more attention to the danger of the Broad-Walmart plan to create unregulated charter schools and hurt the public schools and the district with less money.” He added, “The most important finding that this panel came up with is that there needs to be an increase in enrollment, and the Broad plan does just the opposite.”
Among the financial panel’s suggestions to reduce the financial burdens are offering early retirement for those at the top of the pay grade, which would save a projected $400 million, and changing health care benefits, asking employees to foot part of the bill, a potential savings of $57 million. Absenteeism among the teachers could save $15 million a year alone, the report said.
Delaine Eastin, the former superintendent of Public Instruction and member of the California Assembly, suggested that the district loses too much money for lack of attendance. She said keeping students in school makes them less likely to join gangs or get pregnant, and “there are too many teachers out sick, too many are not showing up.”
Zimmer noted, “It’s an important time for the school district and we note the seriousness that this was laid out.”
Lockyear provided the ultimate warning for what lies ahead for the board and the new superintendent it expects to have in place by the first of the new year.
“Fate is the vengeance of unmade choices,” he said. “Good luck to all of you.”